Heinrichs and Ellis must lead

Like many, I was (and still am) very excited when on January 6 of this year US Soccer put April Heinrichs and Jill Ellis in charge of efforts to stay at the forefront of women’s football.
If ever there was a country that needed a long-term strategy when it comes to women’s football, it is the USA. In the last decade, the USSF has been in stagnation, refusing to modernize, living on its 1999 success.
Like many, I assume that when interviewing and eventually hiring Ellis and Heinrichs, US Soccer discussed with both candidates their vision, master plan and methods of how they plan to take the American game forward. Surely, these two experienced coaches have a detailed vision and plan of how to lead the USA to stay on par with Germany and other countries.
I hoped that both would communicate that vision early on in order to galvanize support.
Two months in and I am not sure if US Soccer is involved in a job creation program or in fulfilling its mission of growing, developing and supporting.

Leading a US national team program is similar to leading a team.
When a new coach takes over, whether during the season or in the off-season, the first team meeting, the first communication is so important. Players begin forming their opinions immediately, so it’s critical that the new coach clearly communicates his/her vision, style of play, and overall coaching philosophy. Players must understand what’s expected of them, on and off the field, from the start.
Most coaches and their assistants spend an entire week working on their first team meeting, making sure season goals are clearly identified, defined and communicated. The key always is to identify goals that are both aspirational and achievable, making those goals clear, communicating them daily and developing strategies to achieve them.
We all are aware of what the challenges faced by Ellis and Heinrichs are: technical deficiency, tactical naivety, lack of facilities, lack of investment, lack of leadership.
To avoid steady decline, Heinrichs and Ellis must provide vision, leadership, methodology and results. They need to outline wider plans, including how they intend to bring the WWC trophy to the USA in 2011 and beyond.
The USA women’s football tradition and history demand that aspirations should not be downgraded. Based on its participation numbers alone, the USA, at all age groups, should finish in the top 2 of every competition.

It’s obvious that Ellis and Heinrichs require authority to implement desperately needed reform. After forming and communicating their vision, Ellis and Heinrichs need the power to implement changes. On the technical side they should have 100% control of things.

Practice does not make better. “Deliberate practice” does.

When young girls join soccer teams, how do parents ensure that they get quality coaching in order to get better, excel and eventually become the best?
A lot of it begins with parents.
Parents can ensure in, what Geoff Colvin calls in his book Talent is Overrated, deliberate practice.
But what is it?

It is high repetition of the right way to perform the task or exercise.
Colvin says, “Repeating a specific activity over and over is what most of us mean by practice, yet for most of us it is not effective.”
This requires that we know what to repeat. In football, success at the highest level is not possible with sound technique and very specific techniques must be repeated over and over by players until ball mastery is achieved.
This leads to another aspect of “deliberate practice.”

It is designed practice.
Meaning someone is leading, demonstrating and telling players how to improve. Colvin says, “The great performers isolate remarkably specific aspects of what they do and focus on just those things until they are improved; then its on to the next aspect.”
To know what those aspects are requires coaching-someone who has been at the field longer and knows the most efficient and effective pathways to success. Parents should observe lessons or coaching sessions so they can reinforce the teaching methods later in the absence of coach.

It is highly demanding mentally.
The mental requirements of “deliberate practice” are the main reason why most players fail at reaching the highest level. The concentration and commitment required to repeat that same exercise over and over until it is executed perfectly each time is what largely separates the average from the great.
“Deliberate practice”, contradictory to what modern US coaching methods demand, is not much fun. If it were inherently fun and easy, everyone would do it, and everyone would be great. Parental involvement is key. Repeating exercises over and over can be boring. Praise and encouragement can help a child stick with a challenge. If a child lacks self-motivation, parental motivation is the next best thing. Evidence shows that in many cases, eventually the child will internalize that motivation. One study looked at the 24 finalists of the Van Cliburn piano competition. Not all were child prodigies. They were forced to practice like everyone else. Colvin relates, “One of the pianists recalled the life changing experience at age 15 of sitting just three feet away as a great pianist performed: ‘I remember feeling inundated and overwhelmed with the dynamic range, with the expressive potential…at that point I became serious like I never had before. I cut out horsing around at the piano. ….I worked.’”

It is pushing players beyond the comfort zone.
Colvin refers to University of Michigan professor Noel Tichy’s three concentric circles, with one being the comfort zone, the next one out being the learning zone, and the outer one the “panic” zone. If we do what only comes easily to us, we will never get better. But if er give ourselves too difficult a task, we freeze-the “panic zone”.
Coaches can easily recognize when they have thrust the child into that zone, and they know how to bring the child back to the “learning zone” where the tasks are just difficult enough to stretch the player.
Finally, it is continued feedback.
Colvin quotes Steve Kerr, former, chief learning officer of Goldman Schs, who said that “practicing without feedback is like bowling through a curtin that hangs down to knee level.” This is also where the coach must be critical. Players (and parents) need feedback to ensure they are in fact getting better.
Parents must remember that coaches are not entertainers, their jobs are to train young players in developing proper skills required to play football and to succeed.

Post convention notes

The 2011 NSCAA convention is over.
It was a great time, as it is every year!
- I especially enjoyed the 2010 Walt Chyzowych Lifetime Achievment Award ceremony. (It was awarded to Sigi Schmid)
- Ralph Lundy is a charming personality. (Hey Ralph, I am planning on taking you up on your offer when I visit Charleston.)
- As with all things in life some sessions were better than others.
- Very minor improvements can be made to make the 2012 experience even more enjoyable and productive:
1. too many sessions are run concurrently making it impossible to attend more.
2. the PA system at one location was not adequate to be able to hear the presenters clearly.
Congratulations to the organization on another quality event.

Much to do for Heinrichs and Ellis.

April Heinrichs and Jill Ellis have a big, big job ahead of them. The next 90 days will give us a hint of what their tenure will be like.
Will they be timid and mere figureheads or will they spark a revolution.
Women’s football in USA is facing challenges which need immediate attention.
Women’s football infrastructure, outside of universities, does not exist. The technical abilities of our youth players are sub par.
Tactically we are naïve. There is no national strategy or structure for player development.

Winning the women’s world cup is an event which sometimes benefits the winning nation, as it did Norway, a nation of only 5 million people, in 1993. Germany benefited from winning in 2003 and 2007. Both nations used their success as a springboard to strengthen their leagues, clubs, programs and structures.
Post 1999, the US did not.

Women’s football in the US does not suffer from lack of money and interest, it suffers from lack of ideas.
Today, there still are two major global leaders in women’s football: USA and Germany, but only one of them reacted to the success of the FIFA Women’s World Cup 11 years ago, and with it the commercial possibilities demonstrated, by exploring every possible way of maximizing that potential.
The 1999 success actually damaged the US by making the USSF complacent. On the other side of the Atlantic it demonstrated to Germany (and also the UEFA and FIFA) what women’s football can become.

In 1999 the German FA developed a long term plan for growing the women’s game sportingly, commercially.
From the beginning the Germans understood that building long term success, interest in the game, and fan loyalty, begins with a national, comprehensive, long term strategy. In Germany there is a balance that benefits both the Frauen Bundesliga and the national team. What is the USSF’s vision for women’s football?

In the US, the commercial success of 1994 and 1999 has not translated into investment in the women’s game.
As I have stated before, the USSF is failing in its fiduciary responsibility of developing women’s football in USA. The federation’s lack of long term strategic planning has been clear to all who care to see it for a decade now.
The success of 1999 has blinded everyone to an international process where all important nations are gaining ground on the USA.
The success of 1999 has, in a perverse way, damaged us.
Women’s football, in terms of marketing, commercial potential, and player development, essentially is a 21st century phenomena but the USSF uses 20th-century methods trying to solve these challenges.
Women’s football will continue, and it will continue to grow internationally, and unless the USSF reforms, unless Heinrichs and Ellis are given real power to envision and implement changes, our international standing will suffer for generations to come.

Happy 2011!

The year of 2010 is almost over. For women’s football fans in USA it was a year of ups and downs, of happiness and of sorrow.
As I sit in front of my computer to compose my last post of the year, I stare deep into my glass of Chimay blue, and reflect on the gallant effort of the Chicago Red Stars and FC Gold Pride owners, and believe that despite their setbacks, better days are coming for fans of women’s football in this country.
I tip my hat to the Whislers, the Weavers, the NeSmiths, of this world. Those who have risked and given much to the sport. I pity ”…those who lived without infamy and without praise. Mingled are they with that caitiff choir of the angels, who were not rebels, nor were faithful to God, but were for themselves.” (Dante’s Inferno)

As 2011 beckons, for all of us who love this sport and want to make it sustainable, hope springs eternal.
I lift my glass to the continuing survival of women’s professional soccer in this country and to a USA victory in Germany.
As I dream of US sports media regularly covering women’s football, as I dream of an USSF as committed to the women’s side of the equation as Mother Theresa was committed to those who required help, as I dream of sports companies supporting the grass-roots women’s football as much as they will support a 10th pick in the NBA or NFL drafts this coming year, a Happy New Year, to you and yours.

Winning

“Winning is everything, to win is all there is. Only those poor souls buried beneath the battlefield understand this.” – US Navy SEAL Team saying

Its a Habit
A famous American football coach, Vince Lombardi said: “Winning is not a sometime thing; it’s an all-the-time thing. You don’t win once in a while, you don’t do things right once in a while, you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing.”
Lombardi was right.
Look at any women’s league in the world, its usually the same teams finishing at the top and the same teams at the bottom. Year in, year out. Its because both winning and losing are states of mind and are habit forming.
Ask Paul Riley, Charlie Naimo, Anson Dorrance, Randy Waldrum, Dino McIntyre.

Congratulations Dino McIntyre!

Congratulations to my long-time friend Dino McIntyre and his Walsh Jesuit HS (Stow, Ohio) girls team on winning their fifth Ohio state title!

Can Christen Press impact WPS in 2011?

A colleague asked me if I agree with him that Stanford forward Christen Press will help any WPS team right away.
I will answer this with two posts I made last year about Casey Nogueira and WPS draft. Both posts are applicable to Press.

“Nogueira has proved a handful to college defenses over the past four seasons. There are rough edges to her game but good coaching will refine them and she has already improved a lot since I first saw her playing for UNC, when she looked a raw talent but with little appreciation for her teammates or understanding of defending.
At that time, I observed that on number of occasions when dispossessed she stood and watched instead of actively trying to regain possession.
I saw her play again this fall in South Bend against Notre Dame and found her an easy mover with a relaxed running style who can control the ball with ease and she possesses the body movement to deceive or sway past defenders.
She prefers facing defenders rather than playing with her back to goal but, partnered by a talented front player who can hold the ball up, Nogueira could thrive at a higher level if she works hard and learns.
I believe that she has talent required to succeed in WPS but it would not be prudent for any club to expect Nogueira to come in and be the focus player from day one. Playing against 20 year old college defenders is vastly different than facing LePeibelt or Markgraf – she will need time to develop and to excel.”

“WPS draft day is only weeks away and everyone is wondering who will be picked first. Will it be Cheney, Heath, Nogueira or O’Hara?
Draft is like Cinco de Mayo: everyone is happy and not thinking about tomorrow. But eventually once pre-season begins, reality will set in. Coaches will immediately see that some players are much better prepared for the pro game while others struggle.
The most pressure, as you’d expect, is with top picks. There will be intense pressure on the coach, GM, and player, for her to produce immediately. Many highly rated players will be drafted with big expectations only to find out it’s much harder than they expected or their teams have different ideas of how to use them.
I remember last year when the Breakers drafted Amy Rodriguez, the league’s first-ever draft. Highly rated based on her college final four performance and national team play, she struggled in Boston and played sporadically.
What happened with Rodriguez is no different than what happens with a lot of top picks in other sports. The coaches, fans and players realize that expectations are unreasonably high for top rookies and in the end, it wasn’t that the player wasn’t “good.” It was that expectations were simply unrealistic.
Playing against 19 year old college defenders is different from facing Rampone. And there is a gulf between playing for the US WNT; surrounded by very good players, playing against outmatched opponents, and facing seasoned WPS pros every weekend.
Rodriguez will probably go on to have long, productive career with another team (or teams) where the expectations of the team and fans will be different and the system might be better-suited to her style.
Usually, if a player can play right now, she’s going to be on the field. If not, it’s the responsibility of the head coach and his staff to develop the player, creating a plan for helping her develop – in her first year and beyond.”

So do I think that Press can help right away?
No.
With experienced coaching it will take her 2-3 seasons before she can consistently deliver at the pro level.
There is no disputing that she is a top forward in NCAA, but even playing for Pali Blues last season, her goal production was much lower than in college. The gap simply is much bigger than casual fans realize.

USA beats Italy 1:0 to qualify for Germany 2011

Italy coach Pietro Ghedin showed respect when he selected a side to play a restraining game rather than to cause a shock but Italy began brightly, dominating midfield with underrated and impressive Alessia Tuttino showing intelligence, both in positioning herself to intercept and to support both Conti and Domenichetti.
Italy right back D’Adda looked vulnerable during her 45 minutes of play and had Megan Rapinoe shown more discipline to stay wider and received more service, Italians would have had more problems with her. As it were, USA’s only goal was a result of a good play by Rapinoe and poor play by Italy GK Picarelli who dropped Rapinoe’s initial shot straight to Amy Rodriguez. Rodriguez made up for her earlier misses with a calm finish.
Against Italy, USA showed patience and discipline and while their 40th minute goal may have been against the run of play, the second half was all USA.
As the match progressed Ghedin, who for this match played his most athletic player Sara Gama at left back specifically to deal with the threat of Heather O’Reilly, made two changes to reinforce, both on his right side, to cope with O’Reilly. The three changes, in my opinion a testimony to the excellence of the right-side work of O’Reilly, who was USA’s best player on the day.
Overall, USA played diligently, all ran tirelessly and fully deserved to qualify despite Italy’s well-organized 180-minute effort.

Can WPS become relevant?

The Equalizer interview with Nancy NeSmith is a very sad reading. Nancy and her husband are clearly well intentioned people pouring their effort and money into a business they were ill prepared to be involved in to begin with.
Unfortunately, NeSmith is not unique and we see it over and over again. Successful businessmen/women start a club and their business acumen goes completely out of the window.
From day one, the success of Gold Pride was built on a foundation of cotton candy and, I don’t say it with a light heart, was always going to collapse. The signing of Marta was the point where it became obvious that no-one in the Pride organization had any idea how to organize a club for long term success.
It was “let’s throw a load of money at an agent and his player”. Admittedly she is one of the best in the world, and helped them win the league title. “Lets hope it will work out. She is coming here to help us succeed long term, not because we’re paying her huge money. We’ll conveniently ignore the fact that nobody else in the world was trying hard to get her”. WPS owners have got to realize when you overreach yourself financially it will always end in tears.
You don’t have to have women’s football experience to see that everyone has money challenges in WPS – but their biggest problem is that nobody appears to know how to turn things around.

Warren Buffet, one of the most successful investors of all time, has been quoted saying “One should never invest in a business they don’t understand” and that “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.” That appears to be a very real challenge.
Throughout the interview with Jeff Kassouf, Nancy’s naivety, lack of understanding and inexperience with women’s football comes through. It is laced with phrases such as “we gambled”, “we thought”, “we felt”.
This does not strike me as a sound strategy and it seldom works in business.
I understand that humans make errors. We all make errors of fact and errors of judgment. We have blind spots in our field of vision. These weaknesses put us at a disadvantage. We make decisions with partial information. Occasionally, we are forced to steer by guesswork. We go with our gut feeling. Long term, that rarely works. The “you hope for something and you wish for something” can never substitute a well thought out business strategy. The NeSmiths hired Montoya and Kessler, to give them intelligent guidance and advise when it comes to player acquisition and club building matters. When it came to signing Marta, every coach and GM wants to have the best player play for them. But its experience and prudence that must guide. It appears that it did not work out.
There are simple rules which all potential women’s football owners should pay attention to:
1. Never invest in a business you do not understand.
2. Never confuse charisma with expertise.
3. Never hire people who lack expertise in your business. (If they were never involved in women’s football before WPS came about, do not hire them.)
4. Never gamble your club’s future on one player.
5. There is no substitute for having a winning team.
6. A winning team does not guarantee commercial success, but a losing team guarantees commercial failure.
7. Success, like organic growth, is incremental in nature.
8. Marketing and hype is only useful when you have quality, otherwise its called false advertising and customers will leave in droves.

In the end, as much as I feel sadness for Nancy and her husband, I very much doubt whether they understand why their club failed.
Today, as I write, WPS clubs are losing relevancy internationally and locally; to potential sponsors, youth clubs and casual fans.
Unfortunately when you ask some WPS owners and GMs what business are WPS teams in,
the most likely answer will be entertainment or pro sports. Wrong on both accounts. Entertainment, really? Good luck competing against Hollywood films, video games, Broadway productions, satellite TV, etc. You can’t comete against the shear volume of options available in today’s world.
Pro sports? How do you compete against the NBA, NFL, MBA and even MLS. You can’t. You will have tough time competing against college handball and basketball.
So what business are you in? Pro football business in general and specifically pro women’s is pure fantasy. A drastically different model is required.
Any league or team can and will become successful only when it becomes relevant to fans and sponsors. Going into their third season, WPS owners still have not figured out how to achieve this. That is their biggest task.
To again quote Buffet: “Your premium brand had better be delivering something special, or it’s not going to get the business.”
And that in a nutshell is the sponsorship and attendance challenges WPS is facing, they can’t deliver, because they don’t know how, to deliver something special for their potential customers.
Reading the NeSmith interview it becomes crystal clear that NeSmiths never knew who their fans were, what they wanted, and how to attract them. Even more important, they did not know how to partner with sponsors and make themselves indispensable to their success.

Will pro women’s football in the USA survive and prosper? Of course it will. Remember that until Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier, before Roger Bannister ran the 4 min/mile, people thought it was impossible. Still, if WPS teams simply continue to cut budgets, they will become another w-league. At that point they will cease to be relevant all together.